Skip to main content

A Search for LGBTQ+ in Scripture: The Book of Mormon (part 2)

 


With regards to anything specific to LGBTQ+, the Book of Mormon is silent.

That's it.

There is no mention of anything that can be tied specifically LBGTQ+, or even homosexual acts in a broader sense.

There are plenty of topics of a sexual nature addressed in the Book of Mormon including:

  1. Lusts of the flesh — 1 Nephi 22:23
  2. Abominations — 2 Nephi 27:1, Mosiah 11:2 & 20, Jacob 2:24*, Alma 39:5
  3. Fornication — Jacob 3:12, 3 Nephi 12:32, Helaman 8:26
  4. Lasciviousness — Jacob 3:12, Alma 45:12, Alma 16:18, Alma 45:12, Alma 47:36
  5. Chastity — Jacob 2:28, Moroni 9:9
  6. Harlots — Alma 39, Mosiah 11
  7. Whoredoms — Mosiah 11, Alma 1:32
  8. Polygamy — Jacob 2:24, Mosiah 11:2, Ether 10:5
  9. Concubines — Mosiah 11, Ether 10:5, Jacob 2:24-28

Some might argue that homosexuality falls under some of the topics that are addressed by the Book of Mormon, possibly abominations, lusts of the flesh, fornication, and lasciviousness. Each of these definitions fails to address homosexuality specifically or describe homosexual acts. These terms apply to general human behavior and could be applied to both heterosexual and homosexual individuals and relationships. Moreover, the instances where these terms appear in the Book of Mormon provide no additional information that correlates those instances specifically with homosexuality.

The term “abomination” is worth noting as it appears with more frequency in the Book of Mormon than any of the other standard works. It is defined as a thing or action that is loathsome, disgusting, or hated. When used in a biblical sense (given that the Book of Mormon has a literary dependency on the Bible), it takes on the meaning of “that which is ceremonially impure.” More on “abomination” when we get to the Old Testament.

Numerous modern prophets and leaders of the church are frequently quoted for having declared that the Book of Mormon was written for our day. Yet, for one of the leading issues of our modern era, the Book of Mormon is enigmatically silent. There are many examples in the Book of Mormon addressing sexual matters of which there is a variety of topics covered, just not this particular topic.

It is unrealistic to expect the Book of Mormon to be able to address every single latter-day issue, but given the number of issues of a sexual nature that ARE addressed it is worth noting that when it comes to homosexuality, there are none — the Book of Mormon is silent.

 With the goal of gaining further understanding of the church’s current standing and policy from what the scriptures have to say on the matter, why is the Book of Mormon silent? What potential conclusions might be derived?

From a faithful perspective, is it possible that the prophets and people described in the Book of Mormon did not single out or exclude LGBTQ+ individuals? When commandments are given they address specific things to do or to avoid. In the book of Mormon, I DO NOT see the denunciation of LGBTQ+. On the other hand what I DO see in the Book of Mormon is prophets speaking against excluding others, speaking against harming others, speaking against taking away someone’s liberty, and speaking against burdening others. How many of the things we DO see in the Book of Mormon would condemn how LGBTQ+ individuals are currently treated within this church?

From a historical perspective, many elements of Joseph Smith’s worldview were influential during the authorship of the Book of Mormon. It is possible that homosexuality had not become under his purview in rural New York, or it was of no concern. Given the repressive puritanical roots and rigid Victorian era sexual perspective of Christendom in New England at that point in history, I might surmise it more likely the former rather than the latter. Though it is impossible to know Joseph Smith Jr’s perspective on homosexuality or LGBTQ+ since there is no record of him speaking directly about the matter.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dropping General Conference

The last remarks of the final talk hung thick in the air, and all I could muster was, “I can’t do this anymore.” I was exhausted.  After sitting through yet another 10 hours of the church’s semi-annual General Conference I sat and reflected on what I had just experienced and what I had gained. All I felt was a weariness that had saturated me; it was more than just the mental effort of focusing on so many hours of one somber talk after another.  I was spiritually exhausted.  I had not been spiritually fed… I was not inspired, uplifted, or edified. There were a couple of talks that offered brief glimmers of hope but were quickly extinguished under the weight of the rest. I was left spiritually drained.  A few years ago, I would have blamed myself for not being dedicated enough. I would have placed myself at fault and held myself responsible for somehow failing to be righteous enough to end the conference feeling this way. Everyone around me always talked about how grea...

A Search for LGBTQ+ in Scripture: The Sin of Sodom (part 5)

The “sin of Sodom” has become synonymous with homoerotic sexual behavior in modern usage and was derived from an interpretation of the events described in Genesis 18. Even so, does the dominant modern-day usage of the terminology derived from Sodom (e.g. sodomy, sodomite, etc) align with how it was used in the Bible? What was the actual “sin of Sodom” as defined by the authors of the Old Testament and how was it used during that time? Taking a look a the story of Lot and his family, prior to the arrival of the angelic visitors, Sodom was already condemned for destruction. There are not many details in Genesis as to what the sin of Sodom was specifically, just that it was “because their sin is very grievous” (Genesis 18:20). Upon the arrival of the angelic visitors to Sodom, Lot invites them to his home. Later, the men of the city of Sodom surrounded Lot’s home and demanded that the visitors be turned over to the mob so that they may “know them” (Genesis 19:5) which was a euphemism that...

In Debt to Faith

  I was in debt the moment I was born into this church. For more than four decades since I took that first breath, I continued to fall further and further into debt. In debt to my parents. In debt to God. In debt to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Expected to give everything that I have and am, even laying down my life if necessary, for the church. At least, that is what I was taught. “…knoweth that ye are eternally indebted to your heavenly Father, to render to him all that you have and are…” Mosiah 2:34 An eternal debt that could never be repaid. No matter how much you do, you are never out of debt. There are many types of debt. By far, the most commonly understood debt is of the financial kind, but there are others. In systems where there is an exchange of value in one form or another there is the potential of creating a debt; for example, technical debt in software development or emotional debt in relationships. With regards to the church, it has not been in fi...